Security and governance

Security should feel like visible product behavior, not a hidden appendix.

The Planerix security story is strongest when buyers can see how tenant scope, approvals, evidence, and deployment posture work inside the same operating model they will actually use.

Planerix treats access, approvals, and run logs as product behavior, not as after-the-fact documentation.
Tenant-aware routing, evidence trails, and action governance stay visible in the workspace itself.
Deployment posture is explicit: hosted rollout first, isolated contour where customer policy requires it.
Current workspace

Governance is easier to trust when it is visible in the workspace

The same product surfaces that show execution also show owner scope, action routing, approval state, and evidence. That is a better security story than a generic compliance page.

Open demo workspace
ExecutiveProjectsOKRAI

Operating score

72

+9

Key priorities

14

11 active

Escalations

5

2 today

Operational radarQuarter
Free org target62%
Pro activation41%
Onboarding completion84%
AI executive briefGrounded
Product and Growth are moving, but kickoff follow-through is slower than OKR progression in two active streams.
Close two blocked tasks, assign pending owners, and confirm meeting follow-ups.
TasksProjectsOKRCalendar

Core control layers

These are the control surfaces customers should understand before rollout: data boundaries, role scope, action governance, and evidence continuity.

Tenant isolation

Separate data, run history, and AI context per tenant contour.

Role-based access

Access follows org roles, owners, approvers, and team scope instead of generic permissions.

Run logs and evidence

Important actions remain traceable to evidence, an owner, and a decision point.

Governed automation

Sensitive changes move through approval and logging before execution.

Impact observation

Observed effect stays linked to the task, project, recommendation, and metric baseline.

Dedicated deployment options

The product has a clear path for isolated infrastructure when customer policy requires it.

Deployment posture should be explicit

Buyers need to know what the hosted contour includes, when a private path is warranted, and which operational controls stay standard in either case.

Hosted rollout

Best for teams that need production-safe defaults, quick activation, and a guided path into connectors, AI, and approvals.

Private or isolated contour

Best for customers with stronger residency, access, or infrastructure requirements that go beyond standard hosted rollout.

What governance means in practice

  • Approval policy for sensitive actions and budget-affecting changes
  • Evidence references for insights, recommendations, and execution history
  • Entity linkage between tasks, meetings, projects, and KPI surfaces
  • Operational logs for connector runs, automation runs, and action outcomes
Connector governance

Security review should map to connector reality

The integration layer shows credential state, readiness, and next steps. That is where access, permissions, and deployment discussions become concrete.

GoogleMetaLinkedInCRMFinance

Ready connectors

4 / 6

Credential scope

Org and user credentials are separated

n8n templates are linked before automation can run.

Google Calendar

Org scope

Active
Credential owner assigned
Template linked

Gmail Inbox

User scope

Mapped
Credential owner assigned
Template linked

Meta Ads

Org scope

Pending
Credential owner assigned
Template linked

LinkedIn Lead Gen

Org scope

Ready
Credential owner assigned
Template linked
Activation path
Save credentials in the right scope
Bind canonical automation template
Open access after readiness checks

Request a security and deployment review

Bring your deployment constraints, approval requirements, and access model. We will respond with the relevant product and rollout view instead of a generic security PDF.

Security FAQ

This section supports both buyer diligence and richer search snippets for security-related queries.

Is security handled only through documentation and policies?

No. Planerix exposes role scope, approvals, action evidence, and execution history directly in the product so customers can inspect how the operating contour behaves.

Can Planerix be rolled out without turning on every integration immediately?

Yes. Teams can start in a manual-first contour and stage integrations later, which keeps access review and rollout risk much lower at the start.

When is a private deployment discussion necessary?

Private or isolated deployment becomes relevant when residency, access policy, approval depth, or infrastructure requirements no longer fit the standard hosted contour.

Quick consultation

Review the security and deployment fit

Share your deployment constraints, approval requirements, and access model so we can map the right rollout posture.

  • Review tenant isolation and approval model
  • Discuss private deployment and data handling requirements
  • Map connector permissions and operational guardrails
Global teams welcomeFull request form

By submitting, you agree that we may contact you about Planerix services.

Next step

Bring your requirements into a concrete rollout conversation

Review security, deployment, roles, and approval logic against the current product and demo runtime.